Home » News » News about NDP » Director Disqualification win – Director Disqualification Investigation (‘ddi’) abandoned by Insolvency Service

Director Disqualification win – Director Disqualification Investigation (‘ddi’) abandoned by Insolvency Service

Case Study: Alleged employment of illegal workers (March 2025)

Summary of this Director Disqualification case

NDP has, in March, 2025 persuaded the Insolvency Service (‘IS’) to abandon its DDI against a Director where his company was issued with Home Office Penalty Notices in relation to the alleged employment of illegal workers in breach of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.  

Outcome

The IS has withdrawn its investigation, and no further action is to be taken.

The allegation of unfit conduct

The IS alleged that the Director had breached his duties as a Director of the company by failing to ensure that the company complied with legislative requirements in that:

  • The company did not comply with its statutory obligations under the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 by employing 2 people, one of whom was found employed on 2 separate occasions.  The 2 people did not have the right to work.
  • Following visits from Home Office Immigration Officers on two separate occasions, during which these breaches were discovered, the company was issued with 2 penalty notices requiring the company to pay tens of thousands of pounds in fines.  The penalty in relation to the first visit was paid and the second penalty remained unpaid in respect of the second visit. 
  • The Director was in office as a Director of the company at the time of the Home Office visits.

NDP Director and Director Disqualification specialist Neil Davies worked on the case which led to the Director successfully responding to and overcoming the above IS allegations.

The IS on the face of it saw a case to investigate and pursue; NDP explained the full and true factual position to the IS within the context of the legal framework.  That persuaded the IS that it had got it wrong here and had insufficient evidence to support its allegations.  It was clearly not ‘expedient in the Public Interest’ to pursue this case.

Key points

The IS are strangers to what has gone before, prior to liquidation.  It is the Director’s job to explain the true factual circumstances to the IS.

On behalf of the Director, we filled in the IS critical knowledge gaps about the factual background to the case, to include obtaining, and interrogation of, communications between the Home Office and the IS.  We gave proper context to the events under investigation by the IS. We invited the Secretary of State (‘SOS’) to withdraw its case, which it did. 

As a result, our client is free to continue to be a Director of his successful company and to be involved in the ‘Management’ of (very widely defined) limited company businesses without constraint.

Evidence and explanations

DDI and Director Disqualification Proceedings (‘DDP’) can have serious consequences, including banning individuals from holding directorial positions and being involved in the management (very widely defined), promotion and/or formation of a limited company for between 2 to 15 years, without the prior Permission of the Court.  The IS does abandon DDI and DDP if presented with sufficient and compelling evidence

That is why it is crucial that Directors should take legal advice as early as possible as the Insolvency Service does not know the Director or his/her/their side of the story.  That’s where we come in to guide the Director through the process and put forward explanations to the Insolvency Service and defend the Director’s position. 

In this case, our client faced legal proceedings which threatened his professional reputation and career.  We carefully scrutinised the evidence and contrasted the IS’ s misunderstanding of the facts with our client’s evidence and explanations as to the true reality of the situation.  The explanations should always be supported by documents and the evidence of others where possible.  That work enabled NDP to respond to the IS and resulted in the Insolvency Service withdrawing its case. 

Our client said was relieved

Our client was understandably relieved and pleased with the successful outcome. His defence was at all times considered strong by our Director Disqualification solicitors and he felt vindicated that the IS decided in his favour.

If you or someone you know is facing DDP, do not hesitate to reach out to NDP. Our expert team is ready to provide the guidance and representation needed to achieve the best possible outcome.

Take a look at some of our testimonials where we achieved good outcomes for Directors being investigated by the IS for possible Director Disqualification.

Contact our Director Disqualification Solicitors today

For a confidential consultation, contact us, call us on 0121 200 7040 or email us law@ndandp.co.uk, Your future deserves the best legal defence – trust NDP to give you a fighting chance against the SOS for Business and Trade and the Insolvency Service.

Leave a comment