Home » News » News about NDP » Minority Shareholders Rights

Minority Shareholders Rights

How can minority shareholders, who are being treated badly, resolve the situation? Our Commercial Litigation Specialists comment

Most people are aware that where there are problems in a Partnership, a partner who is being treated unfairly, can apply to court to dissolve the Partnership and ask the court to resolve matters.

However, what can be done if a shareholder who only holds a minority of the shares in a company is treated badly? After all, as a minority shareholder, they have little or no control over the direction of the business. They may feel isolated and powerless against the majority. In these situations, it is possible to ask the court to intervene and resolve what can be a very unpleasant situation. Andrew Wylde, one of our Commercial Litigation Specialists explains how.

What can a Shareholder do?

A minority shareholder (‘minority’ being defined as 50% or less of the shareholding) can Petition the court for the court to resolve the situation that they find themselves in.

The basis of the Petition is that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of shareholders, including the shareholder bringing the claim.

Section 994 The Companies Act 2006

A claim for unfair prejudice is made under S994 of the Companies Act 2006. Once the court finds that the Petitioner is being unfairly prejudiced, it may make an appropriate order.

Examples of Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct

As commercial litigation specialists, our team sees much of the types of conduct which are typically unfairly prejudicial. They include:

  • Instigating disciplinary proceedings which are sham, with the sole purpose of dismissing the shareholder as an employee.
  • Breaches of Fiduciary Duty (Directors failing to act in accordance with the interests of the company).
  • Misuse and misappropriation of company assets.
  • Mismanagement of the company’s affairs provided this is simply not a disagreement as to how the business is being managed.
  • Allotting further shares for the purpose of diluting a minority Shareholder’s shareholding.

What Types of Order can the Court Make?

Orders which the Court can make include:

  • Ordering the purchase of the Petitioner’s shares at a price and terms to be determined by the court.
  • Requiring the company to refrain from, or to carry out, an act including amendments to the Articles of Association.
  • Authorising proceedings to be commenced in the name of the company.
  • Ordering that the company be wound-up on the grounds that to do so is just and equitable.

In most cases, the Petitioner’s shares are purchased by the other shareholders.


Certain companies are treated by the courts as quasi-partnerships.

A quasi-partnership can exist where the shareholders also run the business and the monies paid for the shares are not simply an investment. In effect, if the business was not a limited company, it would be a partnership between several individuals working together to make a profit.

Consequences of a Quasi-Partnership

If the Court feels that the business is effectively a quasi-partnership, then it can:

  • Give effect to informal agreements and understanding between the shareholders which had been relied upon by the shareholders, even if they would not otherwise have binding legal force.
  • Acts or omissions that are inconsistent with the parties’ relationship, understandings and agreements may constitute unfairly prejudicial conduct even though such actions or omissions are expressly permitted by the company’s constitution.

In effect, where a court finds a quasi-partnership exists, it has far wider powers to find that certain acts or omissions are unfairly prejudicial and are more willing to intervene in the dispute.

A significant number of private limited companies are quasi-partnerships.

Valuation of the Shares

Valuation is determined on the basis of expert evidence produced by the Petitioner and Respondent.  In most cases, both the Petitioner and the Respondent serve an expert’s report, which is submitted to the court.

The court will determine the market value of the shares after consideration of both expert reports.


  • The aggrieved party issues a Petition at court.
  • There is an initial hearing.
  • Evidence is exchanged on both sides.
  • A final hearing takes place at which the court decides how to deal with the parties and their shareholdings.

Our Commercial Litigation Solicitors Conclude

If you (or a client) have a small shareholding in a company and are being victimised or in some other way treated unfairly, you may feel as if you are trapped and have nowhere to turn. However, there are ways of protecting your position. One of the most effective is to ask the court to intervene and make an order under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006.

Our commercial litigation solicitors can help. Contact Andrew Wylde or call us on 0121 200 7040 for a FREE initial discussion.